In the previous episode, I showed that, in May 2020, a newly composed Board of Directors took over Eni’s governance.
That same month, for the fourth time, I took the Flinto Case directly to the company’s governance.
I submitted documents and asked the new Board to have my case investigated and analyzed.
My request was clear:
🔴 Investigate.
Examine the documents.
Compare the different versions.
Establish the facts.
And reach an independent conclusion.
I received no response from the new Board of Directors.
Faced with that silence, I decided to turn to an external institution.
📌 July 16, 2020.
I took the Flinto Case to the Brazilian National Contact Point for the OECD - OCDE Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (NCP Brazil).
It marked an important shift in this story.
For almost two decades, I had tried to obtain answers from within Eni itself - through executives, different Boards of Directors, internal oversight bodies, and Shareholders’ Meetings.
Now, I was taking the conflict beyond the company’s walls.
I filed a complaint with the NCP Brazil concerning Eni’s conduct in relation to the Flinto Case:
🔹 I submitted documents.
🔹 I reconstructed the chronology of events.
🔹 I reported my original whistleblowing disclosure in 2001, my dismissal, and the events that followed.
🔹 And I brought before an institutional mechanism linked to the OECD - OCDE Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises a story that, at that point, was approaching its 20th anniversary.
For me, there was one fundamental question:
🔴 If Eni was not willing to conduct an independent investigation into the Flinto Case, could an external institution finally examine the facts and the documents?
I did not yet know what the answer would be.
But on July 16, 2020, a new chapter was beginning.
The Flinto Case had reached the NCP Brazil.
And just a few months later, another institutional path would open.
This time, through Italian diplomacy.
25 years later, however, my request remains essentially the same:
🔴 That Eni allow a truly independent investigation into the Flinto Case, examining the facts, the documents, and the different versions of my dismissal presented by the company itself over these 25 years.
I am not asking anyone to believe me. I am asking them to examine the documents before reaching an independent conclusion.
📌 NEXT EPISODE:
WHEN ITALIAN DIPLOMACY ENTERED THE FLINTO CASE.
❎ Learn more:
1️⃣ Complaint submitted to the NCP Brazil (July 16, 2020)
🔹 Original document
🔹 English version
2️⃣ Supplement Complaint submitted to the NCP Brazil (July 20, 2020)
🔹 Original document
🔹 English version
3️⃣ Memorial — The Flinto Case
4️⃣ Chronology of Facts for the Reconstruction of Events

No comments:
Post a Comment