An official document from Eni

Every great story has a central document.

In this story, that document was produced by Eni itself.

Its title is:

📌 “Questions and Answers before the 2017 Shareholders’ Meeting”.

For almost a decade, it has remained publicly available on the company’s official website.

In it, Eni presents its version of the facts.

A version that directly mentions my name.

A version that continues to be available to shareholders, investors, journalists and the general public.

But the main issue is not the existence of this document.

Every company has the right to present its position.

The real question is another:

🛑 What happens when documents, evidence and facts emerge that call that version into question?

Over the years, I have repeatedly requested an independent review of the facts and of the body of evidence I have built over more than two decades.

The document remains exactly as it was originally published.

No corrections.

No independent investigation.

No substantive review of the evidence presented.

Tomorrow, I will show the story Eni tells.

And then we will look at the story Eni refuses to investigate.

To be continued...

✅ Learn more about my history with the Italian oil giant Eni:

1️⃣ Memorial (1999–2025);

2️⃣ Chronology of facts supported by documentary evidence.

The question nobody answered

Every great story ends with a question.

Mine began in 2001:

🔹 It involved reporting wrongdoing in Brazil.

🔹 An unjust dismissal.

🔹 Documentary evidence gathered over more than two decades.

🔹 Contacts with Eni Boards of Directors and CEOs (2002, 2009, 2014, 2020 and 2023).

🔹 A critical shareholder brought the Flinto Case to Eni's Shareholders' Meetings (2017, 2018, 2020 and 2021).

🔹 Lawsuits filed by Eni with characteristics typically associated with SLAPP actions (2010, 2017 and 2022).

🔹 The Flinto Case was featured in the investigative bestseller Eni: The Parallel State (2015).

🔹 Italian authorities and institutions such as the OECD and the GPDP.

🛑 And more than two decades of silence.

But there is one simple question that remains unanswered:

📌 If I was wrong, why has Eni never conducted an independent investigation into the facts and the body of evidence?

For 25 long and painful years, the company has never undertaken an independent review capable of objectively examining the allegations presented and the evidence produced.

Perhaps because the answer is more uncomfortable than the question itself.

In the next phase of this series, I will begin presenting the documents, decisions, and events that help explain why this story continues to this day.

On Monday, the documents begin to speak.

✅ Learn more about my history with the Italian oil giant Eni:

1️⃣ Memorial (1999–2025);

2️⃣ Chronology of facts supported by documentary evidence.