Caso Flinto: the official Eni narrative

Every story has two versions.

For years, Eni has presented its official version of the events to shareholders and other stakeholders.

That version was published in a document entitled “Questions & Answers”, released before the 2017 Shareholders’ Meeting, after my case was brought to Eni’s AGM for the first time by a critical shareholder, Mauro Meggiolaro, representative of Fondazione Finanza Etica, an organization linked to Banca Etica, based in Italy.

In that document, the company sought to explain to shareholders the reasons why I had allegedly been dismissed years earlier.

The narrative appears simple.

Objective.

Definitive.

For someone reading it for the first time, there may seem to be no reason to question it.

After all, it is an official document published by one of the world's largest energy companies.

But there is one important detail.

A story does not become true simply because it is published in a corporate document.

Especially when there are documents, facts and undeniable evidence that deserve to be examined.

In the next posts, I will begin to show why this narrative continues to be challenged to this day and why, after 25 years, there has still been no independent investigation into the facts and the body of evidence.

Continues on Wednesday.

✅ Learn more about my history with the Italian oil giant Eni:

1️⃣ Memorial (1999–2025);

2️⃣ Chronology of facts supported by documentary evidence.

An official document from Eni

Every great story has a central document.

In this story, that document was produced by Eni itself.

Its title is:

📌 “Questions and Answers before the 2017 Shareholders’ Meeting”.

For almost a decade, it has remained publicly available on the company’s official website.

In it, Eni presents its version of the facts.

A version that directly mentions my name.

A version that continues to be available to shareholders, investors, journalists and the general public.

But the main issue is not the existence of this document.

Every company has the right to present its position.

The real question is another:

🛑 What happens when documents, evidence and facts emerge that call that version into question?

Over the years, I have repeatedly requested an independent review of the facts and of the body of evidence I have built over more than two decades.

The document remains exactly as it was originally published.

No corrections.

No independent investigation.

No substantive review of the evidence presented.

Tomorrow, I will show the story Eni tells.

And then we will look at the story Eni refuses to investigate.

To be continued...

✅ Learn more about my history with the Italian oil giant Eni:

1️⃣ Memorial (1999–2025);

2️⃣ Chronology of facts supported by documentary evidence.