Eni did not answer them individually.
Instead, it provided a lengthy corporate response - and presented a new version of the reasons for my dismissal.
According to Eni:
🔹 “[...] l’ex dipendente è stato licenziato, unitamente agli autori dei comportamenti illeciti, per reticenza, per aver violato l’obbligo della riservatezza e per il tentativo di utilizzare strumentalmente il Codice di Comportamento del Gruppo Eni per ottenere vantaggi personali dalla Società”
In other words, Eni stated that I had been dismissed, together with those responsible for the irregularities, for reticence, breach of confidentiality and attempting to use the Code of Conduct to obtain personal advantages from the company.
An extremely serious accusation.
But there was something even more important.
Eni cited an official source to support this narrative.
According to the company, the conclusions of its “in-depth investigations” into my case had been reported by the Collegio Sindacale di Eni SpA in:
📌 Eni’s 2002 Annual Report.
Eni was therefore directing its shareholders to an official company document from 2002.
There was only one problem.
Eni’s 2002 Annual Report was not available on its website.
After an extensive internet search, I found it.
354 pages.
But I was looking for something specific.
I wanted to verify what Eni had told its shareholders.
Eni indicated where to find it:
🔹 the Collegio Sindacale Report.
I searched for the allegation that I had been dismissed for reticence, breach of confidentiality or attempting to obtain personal advantages through the Code of Conduct.
I did not find it.
Across the 354 pages of Eni’s 2002 Annual Report, there is not a single reference to Douglas Linares Flinto or the Flinto Case - much less to the conclusion Eni claimed in 2017 was recorded there.
So we have two official documents from the same company:
📌 AGM 2017: Eni stated that conclusions regarding my case had been recorded by the Collegio Sindacale in the 2002 Annual Report.
📌 ENI 2002 ANNUAL REPORT: that information is not there.
I am not asking anyone to believe me.
Both documents will be available.
Read Eni’s response.
Open the 2002 Annual Report.
Search.
And draw your own conclusion.
That is the principle behind this campaign:
🔴 the documents must speak for themselves.
A few months later, in September 2017, Eni initiated a new lawsuit against me.
And there is an important detail:
Eni attached Eni’s Way publications to its initial court filing.
Tomorrow, I will tell that story.
❎ Learn more:
1️⃣ 2017 AGM Questions & Answers
2️⃣ Eni 2002 Annual Report
3️⃣ Memorial (1999–2025)
4️⃣ Chronology of Facts for the Reconstruction of Events
No comments:
Post a Comment