Thursday, September 01, 2016

Tell me who you walk with and I'll tell you who you are!



PDVSA, partner of the Italian giant Eni, is being investigated for corruption... Tell me who you walk with and I'll tell you who you are!


 

How do multiple enforcement authorities from different countries hold one of the largest petroleum producers in the world accountable for years of institutionalized corruption? Press reports on investigations of Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (“PDVSA”), suggest several answers. Authorities go after the company’s former leaders who reside outside of Venezuela. They focus on money laundering as well as bribery offenses. They proceed against the banks that assisted those leaders. They focus on other individuals connected to the bribery schemes. And they cooperate with one another. The PDVSA investigations appear to be an extraordinary undertaking involving so far authorities from the United States, Andorra, Spain and Switzerland.
United States Efforts. According to the Wall Street Journal, the current U.S. Government investigations are aimed at establishing whether Venezuela’s leaders siphoned billions of dollars through PDVSA and at whether they also used PDVSA for “black-market currency schemes and laundering drug money.” In the United States, six individuals have already pleaded guilty.
  • On June 16, 2016, the owner of multiple U.S.-based businesses and resident of Texas, Roberto Enrique Rincon Fernandez (“Rincon”), pleaded guilty in federal court in Houston to one count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA, one count of violating the FCPA and one count of making false tax return statements.
  • On March 22, 2016, in connection with similar allegations, Abraham Jose Shiera Bastidas (“Shiera”), resident of Florida, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA and commit wire fraud and one count of violating the FCPA.
  • In January 2016, four individuals pleaded guilty in connection to bribery and money laundering investigations. This included three former officials of PDSVA (all residents of Texas) – Jose Luis Ramos Castillo (“Ramos”), Christian Javier Maldonado Barillas (“Maldonado”), Alfonzo Eliezer Gravina Munoz (“Gravina”), and Moises Abraham Millan Escobar (“Millan”), a former employee of Shiera. Ramos, Maldonado and Gravina pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering and admitted receiving bribes from Shiera and Rincon for helping them win contracts with PDVSA and for conspiring to launder the proceeds of the bribery scheme. In addition, Gravina admitted making false statements on his 2010 tax return by omitting to report the bribery payments he received. All four defendants agreed to forfeit the proceeds from their criminal activities.
The U.S. government is also reportedly looking into another Venezuelan energy company, Derwick Associates.
Other International Efforts. The U.S. charges that have been made public might be just the beginning. PDVSA schemes could unravel further. In particular, foreign governments appear to be intensifying their efforts too.
Andorran authorities are investigating suspicious transactions involving Venezuelan officials. They have arrested the CEO of Banca Privada d’Andorra (“BPA”) on money laundering charges said to be linked to PDVSA. Relatedly, BPA has been on the U.S. Government’s radar. On March 10, 2015, the U.S. Department of the Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) named BPA a Foreign Financial Institution of primary money laundering concern and issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. This decision was based, in part, on the information concerning the BPA’s role in money laundering of funds in the sum of approximately $2 billion funneled from PDVSA. This decision was then dismissed by the FinCen on February 19, 2016, when the U.S. authorities found the bank’s remedial plan to be sufficient.
Spain’s law enforcement agencies have reportedly launched an investigation of alleged money laundering and corrupt activities involving at least three ex-deputy ministers of Venezuela, the ex-intelligence chief, an executive of PDVSA, and a businessman close to late President Chavez. According to the authorities, these officials are clients of the BPA’s Spanish affiliate.
The Swiss government has also agreed to provide U.S. authorities with information about PDVSA-related transactions. According to reports, the Swiss authorities have agreed to provide U.S. prosecutors records from at least 18 banks related to transactions between the banks and individuals and companies allegedly involved in PDSVA-related criminal conduct. The request for information from eight banks was reportedly received from the U.S. Department of Justice Fraud section, and information requests related to 18 banks was received from U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. At the moment there is no indication that the requested information has been turned over to the U.S. investigators by the Swiss Government.
Where the Venezuelan Government Stands. In the midst of these investigations and prosecutions, the Venezuelan Government has consistently denied the allegations of widespread corruption. It has attributed the investigations to efforts to destabilize Venezuela, a country that is undergoing a serious economic and political crisis. Some believe that former, and even current, PDVSA officials, as well as related entities, might have incentives to seek cooperation with U.S. and other authorities. This is because it is not clear how much longer the current administration will be able to maintain authority in the country. A new administration might take a different approach to PDVSA, perhaps focusing on investigating prior wrongdoing itself. Officials might make the calculation that it is more beneficial to resolve prior misconduct promptly, before the situation grows worse.
Post authored by Matt Ellis, FCPAAméricas Founder & Editor

Monday, August 22, 2016

Involving the President of Italy in my case


If the Board of Eni respected the "Best Practices" of the Corporate Governance - reflected on values as honesty, integrity and transparency - and honored the words and spirit of the Code of Ethics of the company, the Chairman, the CEO and the other directors would be the first ones to emerge the "real truth" about the 15 years story fight of a whistleblower that was fired - in retaliation - after reporting a millionaire scheme of fraud and corruption in the Brazilian subsidiary of the Italian giant Eni.
As three generations of the Board of Eni pretended nothing happened - they spread a "lying version" of facts and keep in the Italian Court a "frivolous lawsuit", demanding an indemnity of US$ 30 million - this whistleblower sent a letter - through the Brazilian Embassy in Rome - to the Chief of State of Italy, the President Sergio Mattarella, so he demands from Eni an "Independent Investigative Auditing" about this case. And this is because the Italian government is the major shareholder of Eni.
Know more:



Thursday, August 18, 2016

Member of the Board of Eni is under investigation



REUTERS' EXCLUSIVE:

Alexandro Profumo, member of the Board of the Italian giant Eni, is under investigation for alleged false accounting and market manipulation during the time in which he was a Chairman of the Monte do Paschi di Siena Bank, in Italy.

And now Board of Eni?


See more in this LINK.

Monday, August 08, 2016

Open Letter to the CEO of Enel



OPEN LETTER TO THE CEO OF ENEL - Mr. Francesco Starace.

The Italian market points you as the successor of ClaudioDescalzi to be in charge of the giant oil company. If this really happens, you will need to know my 15 years story fight against Eni to rescue and restore my name, my honor and my reputation unfairly depreciated. 

The Board of Eni will tell you the "lying version" that turns the whistleblower into the villain of this corporate story.
Access Eni's Whistleblower: 15 years in 15 paragraphs and get to know.

Douglas Linares Flinto
Chairman & CEO
Brazilian Business Ethics Institute





Monday, August 01, 2016

Eni's Whistleblower: 15 years in 15 paragraphs!



My story with the Italian giant and one of the largest companies of the planet began back in 2001 when I was an executive of Eni's Brazilian subsidiary and temporarily took over the main sales management of Agip Brazil. There, I received complaints of irregularities involving conflicts of interests, internal corruption, fraud, and even emission of "cold invoices". Respecting the determinations of Eni's Code of Ethics, I reported the misconducts and nonconformities with the words and spirit of the code, that as the company declares, is the guideline for all the six-legged dog's actions.

On the following weeks, little happened and I ended up getting fired. After invoking Agip Brazil's Committee of Ethics, I got an answer from the Brazilian operation saying that my resignation happened due to an "administrative and organizational restructuring" and not because of a "retaliation", as I stated.

It was evident that the millionaire scheme that I had reported had metastasized throughout the company, and in Agip Brazil's backstage, the top management, in collusion, ran the illegalities and illegal activities practiced in Eni's Brazilian subsidiary.

So I decided to write to the Board and to the company's main shareholders, including to the main one, the Italian Government. The PwC, which at that time was the auditing firm hired by Eni, also received a copy of the new corresponding item. It's the Board of Directors the highest authority inside and outside the company walls, the embodiment of the "Corporate Governance" and the "Big Boss" of all the executives, including the CEO. Besides, the Board is responsible for ensuring the Code of Ethics. Above all, it is the "Guardian of Ethics"!

The resignations at Agip Brazil continued until it reached the commercial management. A few months later, Eni announced to the market the sale of all the Brazilian assets to the state oil company Petrobras, currently involved in the largest corruption scandal in Brazil.

However, no contact was ever made with me, and Eni never answered any of my mails! On the contrary, after killing the "whistleblower" in Brazil, the company tried to do the same thing in Italy!

In 2010, Eni decided to file a civil lawsuit in the Court of Rome against me and the Brazilian Business Ethics Institute - an institution I founded in 2003 to promote Ethics in the business and student world - demanding an indemnity of 30 million Euros for damage caused by my libel or slander.

In this action, oddly enough, Eni states that all the facts alleged by me are untrue and that, in fact, the company made an undercover investigation in Brazil to ascertain any damage. And I, for not collaborating, I ceased the trusting relationship, resulting in my resignation.

Instead of Eni accepting its mistakes, ascertain its faults, enhance controls and honor its own Code of Ethics, the company chose to hide behind a "frivolous lawsuit" in an attempt to intimidate and silence me, and leave under the carpet the ills of its managements.

Fortunately, in late 2014, the judge ruled "groundless" Eni's lawsuit. The company didn't accept my proposal agreement, but preferred appeal the sentence.

I became a victim of my own report! Eni destroyed my professional career when it put me on the "black list" of all the companies operating in my country. And there's more! Eni is also responsible for the loss of my retirement.

In march, 2016 my story against the Italian giant Eni was published in an investigative book written by two Italian journalists (Andrea Greco and Giuseppe Oddo). This book is called The Parallel State: The first investigation on the Eni.  

In celebration of the 15th anniversary of my fight story against Eni, completed in August 2016, I created a petition at Change to request the Board of the company the compliance of their own Code of Ethics regarding my case. 

Now IIA Global will receive a complaint about the "non compliance” practiced by the members of the Internal Auditing Department of the Italian giant Eni, including the Senior Executive Vice-President of Internal Audit (and member of the executive committee of the IIA Italy), Mr. Marco Petracchini, because when an internal auditor does't fulfill the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) of the IIA Global nor its the IIA's Code of Ethics and presents a "lying version" of the results of an internal auditing in a "Frivolous Lawsuit" and also to the global market through the media. This professional may be terminated by IIA Global's Ethics Committee being subject to sanctions and appropriate punishments. This report will be based on the letter requires the Board of Eni to carry out an "Independent Investigative Audit" on my case, sent to the President of Italy (by the Ambassador of Brazil in Rome) and the Prime Minister (by the Senator Italo-Brazilian Fausto Longo). 

Despite everything, I will continue, until my last breath, with my personal quest to rescue and restore my name, my honor, my image and my reputation unfairly depreciated by the six-legged dog.

My fight against a giant continues!