In the previous episode, I showed that the mediation related to Eni’s second lawsuit against me ended without an agreement.
But a new opportunity seemed to be emerging.
📌 2020. A new Eni Board of Directors.
At the Annual General Meeting in May of that year, a newly composed Board took over the company’s governance.
There was a new Chairwoman, Lucia Calvosa.
CEO Claudio Descalzi remained in office.
The new Board was composed of: Lucia Calvosa, Claudio Descalzi, Ada Lucia De Cesaris, Filippo Giansante, Pietro Guindani, Karina Litvack, Emanuele Piccinno, Nathalie Tocci e Raphael Vermeir CBE.
For me, however, the fundamental question was different:
🔴 Would a new governance be willing to do what I had been asking for nearly two decades?
🔹 Investigate.
Not simply accept my version.
Not simply accept the versions presented by the company itself.
But conduct a truly independent investigation, examining the facts, the documents and the different versions concerning my dismissal.
That is what I asked the new Board of Directors once again.
I submitted documents and asked the new governance to conduct an independent review of the Flinto Case - a due diligence of the facts and documents accumulated since 2001.
My request was simple:
🔹 Examine the documents.
🔹 Compare the different versions.
🔹 Establish the facts.
🔹 And reach an independent conclusion.
After almost 20 years, I was not asking the new Board to believe me.
I was asking it to investigate.
And that remains the essence of the ENI’S WAY — 25 YEARS OF TRUTH campaign.
🔴 25 years later, my request remains the same: that Eni allow a truly independent investigation into the facts and documents of the Flinto Case.
I am not asking you to believe me. I am asking you to examine the documents before reaching an independent conclusion.
But would the new Board respond to this request?
The answer - or the absence of one - would lead me to seek a new institution outside Eni.
📌 NEXT EPISODE:
TAKING THE FLINTO CASE TO THE OECD - OCDE.
❎ Learn more:
No comments:
Post a Comment