In the previous episode, I showed that, at Eni’s Annual General Meeting in May 2020, 13 questions concerning the Flinto Case were submitted to the company.
One of them asked:
🔹 Would Eni participate in the mediation related to the second lawsuit filed against me?
There was a reason for that question.
📌 October 29, 2019. Rome.
During a hearing in the second lawsuit, the judge recorded that the mediation procedure had not been initiated and referred the parties to mediation.
📌 July 3, 2020. Rome.
The mediation finally took place before the Rome Mediation Body.
The official record of that meeting expressly identifies the procedure as:
🔴 COURT-REFERRED MEDIATION.
I was represented by my Italian lawyer.
🔹 No agreement was reached, and the mediation ended without a settlement between the parties.
This was not the first attempt at mediation.
In 2018, during Eni’s Annual General Meeting, critical shareholder Mauro Meggiolaro, representing Fondazione Finanza Etica, had offered to mediate a meeting between Eni and me.
That meeting never took place.
In 2020, the circumstances were different.
This time, the mediation took place after the parties had been referred to it by the judge.
And it ended without an agreement.
But my fundamental request was - and remains - much simpler:
🔴 That Eni allow a truly independent investigation into the Flinto Case, examining the facts, the documents, and the different versions of my dismissal presented by the company itself over these 25 years.
I am not asking anyone to believe me. I am asking them to examine the documents before reaching an independent conclusion.
And another opportunity for that would arise.
Eni had just begun a new governance cycle.
A new Board of Directors. The same request: investigate.
📌 NEXT EPISODE:
A NEW BOARD. THE SAME REQUEST: INVESTIGATE.
❎ Learn more:
1️⃣ Mediation Record (July 3, 2020)
🔹 Original document
🔹 English translation
2️⃣ Memorial (1999-2025)
3️⃣ Chronology of Facts for the Reconstruction of Events
No comments:
Post a Comment